• AbouBenAdhem@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    10 days ago

    Spectral JPEG XL utilizes a technique used with human-visible images, a math trick called a discrete cosine transform (DCT), to make these massive files smaller […] it then applies a weighting step, dividing higher-frequency spectral coefficients by the overall brightness (the DC component), allowing less important data to be compressed more aggressively.

    This all sounds like standard jpeg compression. Is it just jpeg with extra channels?

    • Prok@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      10 days ago

      Yeah, it compresses better too though, and jpeg XL can be configured to compress lossless, which I imagine would also work here

        • Cocodapuf@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          10 days ago

          In my experience, as you increase the quality level of a jpeg, the compression level drops significantly, much more than with some other formats, notably PNG. I’d be curious to see comparisons with png and gif. I wouldn’t be surprised if the new jpeg compresses better at some resolutions, but not all, or with only some kind of images.

    • wischi@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      10 days ago

      It’s not just like jpeg with extra channels. It’s technically far superior, supports loss less compression, and the way the decompression works would make thumbnails obsolete. It can even recompress already existing JPEGs even smaller without additional generation loss. It’s hard to describe what a major step this format would be without getting very technical. A lot of operating systems and software already support it, but the Google chrome team is practically preventing widespread adoption because of company politics.

      https://issues.chromium.org/issues/40168998