• M137@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    Here in Sweden I’m experiencing this with both older and younger generations. I know no one my age that has a kid, but so many younger generations have at least one. My little sister has two, and most of her friends do too. It’s weird.

    • pinball_wizard@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      16 hours ago

      My little sister has two, and most of her friends do too. It’s weird.

      I suppose that makes sense. Support has gotten much stronger, in the last decade or two, for using multiple monitors.

  • BigDaddySlim@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    ·
    2 days ago

    Baby: costs thousands and thousands and thousands of dollars over a minimum of 18 years

    Monitor: shows memes and games, costs a few hundred dollars for a good one, one time purchase

    Obviously the child is the stupid financial decision

    • disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      It depends on where you live. Believe it or not, kids still care for their elderly parents in some nations.

      • Septimaeus@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        17 hours ago

        I think the key to this scheme working, however, is that you raise your children in such a selfless way that they would want to take care of you when you have nothing more to offer them. Which is to say, the only way this method works is if it’s not a “method” at all, just love.

        Edit: inb4 honor culture. In the places you likely refer to, uncared-for elderly are considered a great dishonor. But also in these places, differences in social infrastructure and the parameters of personal finance significantly augment the decision. In short, it’s still a net cost of time and resources to raise a child, a balance that can only be paid by love.

        • disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          17 hours ago

          I’m sure my daughter would want to. The problem is it’s completely unrealistic in the US. When I’m too old to care for myself, I’m going to insist on a nursing home. Hell, the LAN parties are going to be great by then.

          • Septimaeus@infosec.pub
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            6 hours ago

            It’s true. These days the average household income in the US isn’t enough for the added costs of elderly care without the supplement of social security and other programs. That trend only worsens.

            I’m optimistic, however, that this will change as the differences in generational attitudes towards socialism are reflected more strongly in governmental policy. The baby boomers are already losing their grip on the levers of politics, and the millennials, in particular, are much more friendly to social policies.

            • disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              6 hours ago

              That’s true, although this administration is perfectly timed to siphon off the largest wealth transfer in US history with the demise of the boomers.

              • Septimaeus@infosec.pub
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                32 minutes ago

                True, though statistically it’s just cleaning the plate, as global elites have had their fill over many decades. Once people finally decide to stop pointing fingers at each other and unite against this scourge, there will be nowhere to run.

                Afterward, global economies should stabilize and nations which start this process early will, I suspect, see much growth during the global recovery, so here’s hoping americans have some revolutionary spirit left.

      • Midnight Wolf@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        20
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        Making a life-changing decision - for more than just yourself - on the assumption that they will want anything to do with you in 40 years is, how do I put this… stupid as fuck?

        And that assumes they also are able-bodied, of sound mind and judgement, can care for any others financially…

        My folks are getting up there in age, and I’m not getting any younger myself. They are religious, I’m not. I’m LGBT, they are bigoted. I can understand the big picture of caring for others through community, they don’t. They are still very capable and mobile, I’m disabled. What side of the fence do you think I’m on?

        They could have just used a fucking condom. They should have. They didn’t.

        • GregorGizeh@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          15
          ·
          2 days ago

          With all due respect, I think your personal bias is entirely coloring your opinion here. Most people have at least an amicable relationship with their parents as adults, generally much closer than that. Just because you have a bad one doesn’t mean people shouldn’t have kids.

          In fact we need more kids, especially when raised by progressive people, because the fascists are having them too.

          • Sterile_Technique@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            14
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 days ago

            we need more kids, especially when raised by progressive people, because the fascists are having them too.

            We’re not going to out-breed stupid or evil. Tbh, having a kid for the sake of shoving them into that death spiral is cruel as fuck.

            …also kids aren’t their parents - you can do all the right steps in raising them and still wind up with a fucking Nazi once they leave the house, and now we’ve got a net loss on all fronts.

            Vice versa is also true ofc, but please don’t crank out a baby just to use it as a footsoldier in a losing war on a dying planet.

          • Midnight Wolf@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            10
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            2 days ago

            I didn’t say ‘don’t have kids’, but you must realize that you are forcing a being into the world that may not see things as you do, regardless of what/how/why, and assuming they will follow an assumed plan that you have carved out is… controlling another being, in any capacity, that isn’t 100% concentual, is bad in my view. Hard stop, no exceptions. If that is ‘I don’t want to be your nurse in old age’, or ‘I loathe that you have created me’ or anything in between or beyond, is irrelevant.

  • NigahigaYT@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    2 days ago

    Two monitors suck, don’t fall for it. Traded out my 24" & 27" setup for a single 32" and loving it

    • grue@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      2 days ago

      The key is triple monitors so you don’t have a bezel in the middle of your field of view.

      • Sterile_Technique@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        2 days ago

        bezel in the middle of your field of view

        One monitor straight ahead for games, 2nd monitor off to the side for discord or some media.

        Or 2nd monitor for the map of the game in the first monitor (game devs!! Pretty please?!).

      • I_Has_A_Hat@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        Triple monitors. Highest quality in the center. One off to the side for videos/discord/other side programs. One off to the side mounted vertically for reading documents and web pages.

        • Bgugi@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 hours ago

          I had the goofiest setup years ago… It was a single 16:9 1080p in the middle, with two 4:3 (1024x768?) monitors rotated. The sizes were just right so the pixel density was the same, and the sides only had a little bit of overscan when joined to imitate an ultrawide.___

        • grue@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          I’m more a fan of identical triple monitors and keeping them all in the same orientation (all vertical for doing a lot of programming; all horizontal for everything else), but that might just be my perfectionism coming through.

    • TastyWheat@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      Got a curved 45" ultrawide. It’s one of the highlights of my day sitting in front that thing.

      Still, dual monitors can be useful for sure. It may look ‘messy’, but definitely functional.